Saturday, July 4, 2026
FB X LI YT
Breaking
Bandits Foiled: Hunters, Military Repel Attack on Kwara Traditional Ruler, Two Injured BREAKING: Kwara Government Takes Ex-Governor Saraki to Court Over Claim About AbdulRazaq’s Education Louisiana Man First in Region to Be Functionally Cured of Sickle Cell Disease Through Gene Editing EFCC Chair Reveals How Yahoo Boys Stole Judge’s N7.2m Child’s School Fees Overnight BREAKING: FG Summons Ivorian Ambassador Over Death of Nigerian in Custody, Demands Compensation South Africa to Nigeria: “We Will Pay No Compensation – Tell Us Where Your Drug Dens Are” WANTED 🇳🇬🚨: Nigeria Police declare six Anambra men wanted over alleged criminal conspiracy, cyberstalking, criminal defamation, incitement and other related offences. “Yoruba Is Not Just a Language, It Is a Way of Life” – UI VC Declares as Foreign Scholars Flock to Study Yoruba Culture
NEWS

Alleged Malabu Oil Scam: Court Discharges ex-AGF Adoke, Others

March 28, 2024 2 min read

Justice Abubakar Kutigi of the High Court of the Federal Capital Territory, sitting at Jabi, Abuja, on Thursday discharged a one-time Attorney-General of the Federation (AGF), Mohammed Adoke SAN and six other defendants standing trial for alleged infractions in Malabu Oil and Gas.

The Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) had, on behalf of the Federal Government , dragged Adoke and others before the court on the controversial Oil Prospecting License (OPL) 245, otherwise known as Malabu Oil scam, before the court.

Adoke, who served as AGF and Minister of Justice under the administration of former President Goodluck Jonathan, was dragged before the court by EFCC in the suit, marked FCT/HC/CR/151/2020, alongside Aliyu Abubakar; Rasky Gbinigie; Malabu Oil and Gas Limited; Nigeria Agip Exploration Limited; Shell Nigeria Extra Deep Limited and Shell Nigeria Exploration Production Company Limited on an amended 40-count charge bordering on the controversial Malabu Oil scam.

Ruling on the no-case submission filed by the defendants after the prosecution had closed its case against them, Justice Kutigi held that the anti-graft agency had not established elements of the offences the defendants were charged with

He added that the prosecution neither called certain witnesses nor tendered to prove its case against the former AGF and other defendants.

While discharging the defendants of the charges against them, the judge commended the prosecuting counsel for admitting that the prosecution was not able to establish prima facie case against the defendants.

He, however, lamented that it took the prosecution four years before it realised this fact.